|
|
|
| Covert Attention Experiment | By: Ric Toploski (rtopolsk@aug.edu) Augusta State University Augusta, GA |
|
|
|
| Introduction Task and Stimuli Design References |
|
Introduction |
|
| Covert attention differs from overt attention
in the same way that observing something out of the corner of the eye differs
from gazing at it. The distinction is readily understood by students who are
generally quite good at using their covert attention to focus on the really
interesting stimuli in a classroom while maintaining their overt attention on
the teacher. Rather than use the colloquial "out of the corner of the
eye" definition for covert attention, one can use the more formal
"peripheral visual and mental focus." A benefit of covert attention is
that it enables us to respond more quickly to attended events, as illustrated by
this experiment in which covert attention is manipulated. « Return to Top» |
|
Task and Stimuli |
|
| The experiment is a modified version of a task
employed by Posner, Nissen, and Ogden (1980). On each trial, four orange boxes
appear in the corners of the screen. Initially all four boxes are equal in
illumination, but after a variable delay, one of four boxes "lights
up" relative to the others. The delay is measured relative to the
appearance of a cue in the middle of the screen. The cue is valid, invalid, or
neutral. A valid cue is an arrow that points to the side on which the
illuminated box will appear. An invalid cue is an arrow pointing away from the
side on which the illuminated box will appear. The neutral cue is a plus sign.
The purpose of these cues is to direct the participant's covert attention. Overt
attention should not change because the eyes must remain focused on the center
of the screen for the participant to be able to simultaneously observe all four
boxes (which are fixed via a user-controlled adjustment to appear at 7º to the
right and left of center screen). The participants' task on each of the 100
trials is to identify which side the brightened box appears on as quickly and
accurately as possible. In order to make shifting one's covert attentional focus
advantageous, valid trials are 3 times more likely to occur than invalid trials. « Return to Top» |
|
Design |
|
|
The experiment uses a 3 X 6 within subjects design with the first variable being cue type (valid, invalid, or neutral)and the second being the delay between cue and illumination. The delays are 0, 50, 100, 200, 400, and 800 msec. The purpose of this variable is to determine when shifts of attention are most beneficial/harmful. For example, at short delays, when the arrow appears at approximately the same time as the brightened box, there should be little difference in reaction time based upon cue type since participants don't have enough time to shift. However, at longer SOA's, when the arrow appears prior to the brightened box, participants should show a benefit for valid information and a cost for invalid information. The dependent variable in the experiment is
participants' speed in identifying the location-right or left-of the brightened
box. |
|
References |
|
| Posner, M.I., Nissen, M.J., & Ogden, W.C. (1977). Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location. In H.L. Pick & I. J. Saltzman (Eds.), Modes of perceiving and processing information (pp.160-174). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum. | |
|
|
|
|
Last revised:June 03, 2003 11:46:56 AM |
|